universitycorruption.com            

 

 

Dr. Susan Hansen   -     Private (private file argues that Hansen should not be on a hearing panel)

 

 

Susan Hansen, hansens@uwplatt.edu, 608.342.1436, decided to continue with an appeal hearing before the kangaroo panel even though Dr. Burton, the appellant, was too sick to be at the hearing.  She allowed the kangaroo panel to be fed lies that had nothing to do with the statement of charges.  She allowed the hearing to extend far outside the scope of the charges against Dr. Burton without giving Dr. Burton an opportunity to cross-examine or confront adverse witnesses. 

 

Dr. Hansen was chosen to be on the kangaroo panel in violation of policy.  Dr. Hansen became the chair of the kangaroo panel in an unknown and undisclosed process.  She was likely selected as chair of the panel indirectly by Chancellor Shields. 

 

How far will Susan Hansen go to get Dr. Burton fired on bogus and false charges?  We should not have to find out.  She should be immediately disqualified from sitting on any panel that is to decide whether Dr. Burton, champion of student rights, is to be dismissed.

 

Why is Dr. Hansen co-chair of the Appeals Commission?  Why and how was she selected as chair of the kangaroo panel?  It seems she “volunteered” and that was the only explanation why she was made chair of the panel.  There was no explanation given, that I am aware of, that tells who decided Hansen would be chair of the panel.   I volunteer.  Why am I not now, chair of the panel?  Something is fishy.  

 

There are more arguments supporting my assertion that Hansen should not be a member, let alone chair, of the kangaroo panel on a private page here (Private).  We plan to present these arguments at a later date.

 

Faculty Handbook 2016:   6.3.12.3 Section 7 says:  Procedure for Evidentiary Hearing and Deliberative Meeting  -  The chairperson of the appeal panel convenes the hearing and serves as presiding officer. The chairperson assumes all the normal responsibilities of a committee chairperson and rules on such questions as may arise on the procedure of the hearing, admissibility of evidence, and all other matters related to the hearing.”

This seems to indicate to me that Dr. Hansen is individually responsible for any and all violations of policy committed by the hearing panel.